From:	MERC::"uunet!CRVAX.SRI.COM!RELAY-INFO-VAX" 10-JUL-1992 06:56:20.68
To:	info-vax@kl.sri.com
CC:	
Subj:	Re: LICENSE-E-NOAUTH error from captive account login??


In article <1992Jul9.072352.3251@spcvxb.spc.edu>, terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.) writes:
|>Path: nntpd.lkg.dec.com!news.crl.dec.com!deccrl!caen!destroyer!uunet!stanford.edu!rutgers!spcvxb.spc.edu!terry
|>From: terry@spcvxb.spc.edu (Terry Kennedy, Operations Mgr.)
|>Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
|>Subject: Re: LICENSE-E-NOAUTH error from captive account login??
|>Message-ID: <1992Jul9.072352.3251@spcvxb.spc.edu>

In article <1992Jul8.160056.14485@panix.com>, jhawk@panix.com
(John Hawkinson) writes:
|> Today I created an account w/ /FLAG=CAPTIVE. Now, everytime
|> there's a login to that account, I get t the following message
|> sent to operators w/ LICENSE enabled:
|> 
|> %%%%%%%%%%% OPCOM blah blah
|> Message from user FOO
|> %LICENSE-E-NOAUTH, DEC VMS-DAAL use is not authorized on this node
|> -LICENSE-F-NOLICENSE, no license is active for the software product
|> -LICENSE-I-SYSMGR, please see your system manager
|> 
|> What the hell is causing this?

    Please deassign the logical name lmf$display_opcom_message.

    (There is an error in the LMF V1.0 documentation concerning
    this logical name.  This error has been corrected in more
    recent documentation.  One should define the logical name
    lmf$display_opcom_message only if instructed to do so by a
    Digital representative.)

    What you are seeing is the expected behaviour -- if the logical
    name is defined.  It is not an error and no message should be
    displayed.

    Stephen Hoffman
    Digital Equipment Corporation